Skip to content
Skip to page content
soylai.com

A Question of Trust — study notes

8 sections 5 min readBeta

1. About the text and the author

Read the story itself in your textbook, Footprints without Feet (NCERT supplementary reader). This lesson is SOYL's explanation and analysis; it does not reproduce the text.

Victor Canning (1911–1986) was an English writer of thrillers and spy novels, known for clever plots and twists. This short crime story is told in the third person and set at Shotover Grange, an English country house.

Table of facts: the author is Victor Canning, 1911 to 1986, an English writer of thrillers and spy novels known for clever plots; the story is a short crime story with an ironic twist, told in the third person; it is set at Shotover Grange, an English country house; the main characters are Horace Danby and a young woman who is not what she seems.
About the text
AuthorVictor Canning (1911–1986), English writer of thrillers and spy novels
Known forsuspense fiction with clever plots and twists
Genrea short crime story with an ironic twist, told in the third person
SettingShotover Grange, a large English country house
Main charactersHorace Danby, a respectable locksmith and secret safe-breaker; a young woman who is not what she seems

Key terms

Twist

An unexpected turn in a story, often at the end.

2. Summary (in SOYL’s words)

The thief. Horace Danby, a middle-aged, unmarried locksmith, seems respectable to all. To buy rare, costly books he commits one carefully planned, non-violent robbery a year.

The plan. His target is Shotover Grange, which has a safe full of jewels. The owners are in London and the servants are out. His one weakness is hay fever, and the house is full of flowers.

The woman. A young woman appears, calm and amused, and lets him think she owns the house. She says she has forgotten the combination and will not call the police if he opens the safe.

The safe. Horace opens it without his gloves and hands over the jewels.

The truth. The police find his fingerprints and arrest him. The woman was a thief. Horace, in prison, finds it hard to accept how he was used.

The story in six stages (SOYL summary).

3. Themes and message

  • The deceiver deceived: Horace is tricked as he tricks others.
  • Misplaced trust: he believes a stranger who seems respectable.
  • Appearance versus reality: both thieves wear respectable faces.
  • Crime does not pay: he gains nothing and goes to prison.
  • Pride before a fall: working without gloves.
  • Self-deception: he thinks a polite crime is harmless.

Message: dishonesty catches up with us, and those who exploit trust may find their own trust exploited.

Table of six themes with where each appears: the deceiver deceived, misplaced trust, appearance versus reality, crime does not pay, pride before a fall, and self-deception.
ThemeWhere we see it (SOYL summary)
The deceiver deceivedA thief who fools the world is fooled by a thief.
Misplaced trustHorace believes a stranger because she seems respectable.
Appearance versus realityBoth thieves hide behind respectable faces.
Crime does not payHorace gains nothing and goes to prison.
Pride before a fallShowing off his skill, he leaves fingerprints.
Self-deceptionHorace thinks a polite crime is a harmless one.

Key terms

Situational irony

When what happens is the opposite of what we expect.

4. Horace Danby

Outwardly respectable (a trusted locksmith). Cultured (rare books). Methodical (one planned robbery a year). Polite and non-violent. Gullible (believes the woman). Vain about his skill (opens the safe without gloves). His strengths made him successful for years; his weaknesses ruined him in one evening.

Table of Horace Danby’s traits with evidence: outwardly respectable, cultured, methodical, non-violent and polite, gullible, and vain about his skill.
Horace’s traitEvidence (in SOYL’s words)
Outwardly respectableAn unmarried locksmith trusted by his neighbours.
CulturedSpends his loot on rare, costly books.
MethodicalPlans one careful robbery a year; studies the house.
Non-violent, politeThinks of himself almost as a gentleman thief.
GullibleBelieves the woman’s claim to own the house.
Vain about his skillOpens the safe without gloves for an admiring audience.

5. The young woman

Cool and composed (no fear of a burglar). Cunning (turns his crime to her profit). Convincing (plays the lady of the house). Ruthless (leaves him to take the blame). She mirrors Horace, only more skilfully.

Table of the young woman’s traits with evidence: cool and composed, cunning, convincing and ruthless.
The young womanEvidence (in SOYL’s words)
Cool and composedShows no fear on finding a burglar.
CunningTurns his crime into her opportunity.
ConvincingActs the lady of the house perfectly.
RuthlessLeaves Horace to take the blame.

6. Irony, twist and tone

  • Situational irony: the trickster is tricked.
  • Clues on re-reading: her calm, her bargain.
  • A fitting twist: surprising yet just.
  • Ironic title: trust is the question; his answer ruins him.
  • Tone: light and wry.

SOYL practice sentence (not from the story): The pickpocket reached home to find that his own wallet had been stolen on the bus (the cheat is cheated).

Key terms

Poetic justice

An outcome in which wrongdoing is fittingly punished.

7. Word meanings

Key words for discussing the story: respectable, locksmith, gullible, allergy, combination, irony, impostor, comeuppance. Use them in your own sentences, for example: Horace, a gullible locksmith, met an impostor more skilful than himself.

Key words for this story with their meanings.
WordMeaning
respectableregarded as honest and decent
locksmitha person who makes and repairs locks
gullibleeasily deceived
allergya bodily reaction to a substance such as pollen
combinationthe sequence of numbers that opens a safe
ironyan outcome opposite to what is expected
impostora person who pretends to be someone else
comeuppancea deserved punishment

8. Answering exam questions

How this reader is examined: the board sets 3-mark short answers (40–50 words; two of three) and a 6-mark long answer (100–120 words) on Footprints without Feet. It does not print extracts from this reader; SOYL’s commentary items are comprehension practice only.

Short answers (3 marks): point + evidence + explanation.

Long answers (6 marks): a clear stand; three points with evidence in your own words; a link to a value or theme; a one-line conclusion. Extrapolation tasks (Horace’s prison diary, the woman’s letter) must stay consistent with the story.

Re-read the story in Footprints without Feet before a test.

Exam tips

Board weight: Footprints short answers (3 marks, 40–50 words, two of three) and one long answer (6 marks, 100–120 words) (CBSE 2026-27, Section C). No extracts from this reader.

How marks are awarded: content (relevant events, accurately used), interpretation (a clear, supported view or value), and expression within the word limit.

Common mistakes

  1. Saying the woman owned the house: she was a thief posing as the owner.
  2. Saying Horace kept the jewels: he handed them over.
  3. Forgetting the gloves: his fingerprints convicted him.
  4. Calling Horace violent: he prided himself on avoiding violence.
  5. Quoting lines from memory instead of explaining in your own words.

Remember: read the story in your textbook, Footprints without Feet.