1. Why international organisations?
An international organisation is a body set up by states, through agreement, to help them cooperate. It is not a world government: it acts through the consent of its members and has no army of its own.
Why needed:
- Many problems (epidemics, conflict, trade, climate) cross borders.
- A permanent body gives rules, information and a meeting place, which lowers distrust and the cost of each negotiation.
- It offers smaller states a voice.
They cannot abolish war, but they make cooperation and peaceful settlement more likely.
| Shared problem | Why one state cannot solve it alone | How an organisation helps |
|---|---|---|
| Epidemics | Diseases cross borders quickly | Early warning and common health standards |
| War and conflict | Each side distrusts the other | A forum for talks and peacekeeping |
| Trade and money | Rules must be the same for all | Agreed rules and a place to settle disputes |
| Climate and environment | Pollution has no passport | Joint targets and shared information |
Key terms
- International organisation
A body created by agreement among states to help them cooperate on shared problems.
- Sovereign state
A state with supreme authority over its own territory, which joins organisations by its own choice.
2. Evolution of the UN
- The League of Nations (1920) was formed after the First World War but failed to prevent the Second.
- During that war the allies planned a new body; the Atlantic Charter (1941) set out common aims.
- The UN Charter was signed at the San Francisco conference in June 1945.
- The UN came into existence on 24 October 1945 (UN Day) with 51 members; today it has 193.
- India was one of the founding members.
Aims: maintain international peace and security; develop friendly relations among nations; cooperate on economic, social and humanitarian problems; promote human rights.
| Event | Year | Clue for ordering |
|---|---|---|
| League of Nations begins work | 1920 | After the First World War |
| Atlantic Charter | 1941 | During the Second World War |
| UN Charter signed; UN begins | 1945 | End of the Second World War |
| IAEA set up | 1957 | Atoms for peace, Cold War years |
| WTO replaces GATT | 1995 | After the Cold War |
Key terms
- League of Nations
The organisation set up after the First World War; it failed to stop the Second World War.
- UN Charter
The founding treaty of the UN, signed at San Francisco in June 1945.
3. Principal organs and specialised agencies
- General Assembly: all members; one state, one vote; debates, budget, elections; resolutions mostly recommendations.
- Security Council: 15 members: 5 permanent (USA, UK, France, Russia, China) with a veto, 10 non-permanent elected by the Assembly for two-year terms (five each year). A substantive decision needs 9 votes and no negative vote by a permanent member; an abstention is not a veto.
- Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): economic and social cooperation; coordinates specialised agencies.
- International Court of Justice: at The Hague; legal disputes between states; advisory opinions.
- Secretariat: administration; headed by the Secretary-General, appointed by the Assembly on the Council's recommendation.
- Trusteeship Council: supervised trust territories; suspended operations in 1994.
Specialised agencies (WHO, ILO, FAO, UNESCO and others) are separate organisations linked to the UN and coordinated through ECOSOC.
| Specialised agency | Field |
|---|---|
| World Health Organization (WHO) | Health standards, epidemics, vaccination |
| International Labour Organization (ILO) | Workers' rights and labour standards |
| Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) | Food security and farming |
| UNESCO | Education, science and culture |
Key terms
- Veto
The power of each permanent member to block a substantive Security Council decision by voting against it.
- Specialised agency
An autonomous organisation working in one field, linked to the UN by agreement.
4. Reform of the UN after the Cold War
Why: membership has grown from 51 to 193; the Cold War is over; new powers and new threats (terrorism, civil wars, climate, disease) have emerged; but the permanent five remain those of 1945.
Two kinds of reform:
- Structures and processes: membership of the Security Council, the veto, working methods.
- Jurisdiction: which issues the UN should take up.
Proposed criteria for new permanent members (debated, none adopted): major economic power; major military power; substantial budget contribution; large population; respect for democracy and human rights; adding regional and cultural diversity.
The veto: supporters say it keeps great powers committed and makes action enforceable; critics call it undemocratic and outdated. Changing the Charter needs the agreement of the permanent members.
A dominant power: after the Cold War, concern grew that one powerful member could shape the UN through its budget share and veto; yet the UN remains the main forum for all states.
| Kind of reform | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Structures and processes | How the UN is organised and decides | Changing Security Council membership or the veto |
| Jurisdiction | Which issues the UN should deal with | Terrorism, development, human rights |
| Proposed criterion | What it tries to measure |
|---|---|
| Major economic power | Capacity to contribute and influence |
| Major military power | Capacity to keep peace |
| Substantial contributor to the UN budget | Commitment to the organisation |
| Large population | Weight of people represented |
| Respects democracy and human rights | Values of the Charter |
| Adds regional and cultural diversity | Representation of the whole world |
| Keep the veto | Limit or end the veto |
|---|---|
| Keeps major powers inside the UN | Lets one state block the will of the majority |
| Decisions backed by the strong are easier to enforce | Leaves the Council silent in some crises |
| Avoids the fate of the League | Reflects 1945 power, not today's world |
Key terms
- Jurisdiction
The range of issues on which an organisation may act.
- Permanent member
One of five states with a permanent Security Council seat and a veto.
5. India and UN reform
India supports a stronger, more representative UN with an expanded Security Council in both categories, and seeks a permanent seat. It works with Brazil, Germany and Japan (the G4), which also seek seats.
Grounds put forward: one of the two most populous countries and the largest democracy; long participation in UN peacekeeping; a large and growing economy and regular contributions; a voice for developing countries; it has served as an elected member several times (most recently 2021–22).
Objections raised by some states: possession of nuclear weapons; disputes with neighbours; doubts about regional representation; and a group of states that opposes any new permanent seats and prefers more elected seats.
These are positions held by different states; examiners expect both sides.
| Arguments made for India | Objections raised by some states |
|---|---|
| One of the two most populous countries and the largest democracy | Possession of nuclear weapons |
| Long record in UN peacekeeping | Disputes with some neighbours |
| Large, growing economy; regular UN contributions | Doubt whether one state can speak for a whole region |
| Voice for developing countries | Some states oppose any new permanent seats |
| Criterion | Imagined state Varunadesh | Meets it? |
|---|---|---|
| Economic power | Tenth-largest economy (imagined) | Yes |
| Budget contribution | Among the top fifteen payers (imagined) | Yes |
| Population | About 9 crore people (imagined) | Partly |
| Democracy and rights | Regular elections, free press (imagined) | Yes |
| Regional balance | Its region already has a permanent member | No |
Key terms
- G4
Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, which support each other's bids for permanent seats.
6. Other international organisations
- IMF: planned at Bretton Woods (1944); oversees the international financial system, advises on policy and lends in payments crises; votes weighted by quota.
- World Bank: also from Bretton Woods; loans and grants for development (infrastructure, education, health, agriculture, environment, governance); criticised for conditions.
- WTO: set up in 1995 as the successor to GATT (1948); rules of world trade and dispute settlement; developing countries say major economies dominate.
- IAEA: set up in 1957; promotes peaceful nuclear energy and runs safeguard inspections.
- Amnesty International: an NGO that researches abuses, publishes reports and campaigns for human rights.
- Human Rights Watch: an NGO based in New York; investigation, media and lobbying, for example against child soldiers and landmines.
NGOs have no enforcement power; their influence comes from publicity.
| Organisation | Set up | Main role |
|---|---|---|
| International Monetary Fund | 1945 (planned at Bretton Woods, 1944) | Global financial system; help in payments crises |
| World Bank | 1945 (planned at Bretton Woods, 1944) | Loans and grants for development |
| World Trade Organization | 1995 (after GATT, 1948) | Rules of world trade; trade disputes |
| International Atomic Energy Agency | 1957 | Peaceful nuclear energy; safeguard inspections |
| IMF | World Bank | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Stability of the financial system | Long-term development |
| Typical help | Short-term loans in payments crises; policy advice | Loans and grants for roads, schools, health, farming |
| Voting | Weighted by contribution (quota) | Weighted by contribution |
| Common criticism | Strict conditions on borrowers | Projects and conditions shaped by rich members |
| WTO | IAEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Rules for international trade | Peaceful use of nuclear energy |
| How it works | Negotiated agreements; dispute settlement | Technical help; inspections and safeguards |
| Debate | Developing states say big economies set the agenda | Inspections need the consent of states |
| Amnesty International | Human Rights Watch | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Non-governmental organisation | Non-governmental organisation |
| Methods | Research, reports, letters and campaigns | Investigation, reports, media and lobbying |
| Examples of concern | Prisoners of conscience, torture, death penalty | Child soldiers, landmines, abuses in conflicts |
| Power | No power to enforce; influence through publicity | No power to enforce; influence through publicity |
Key terms
- Bretton Woods institutions
The IMF and the World Bank, planned at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference.
- NGO
A non-governmental organisation, independent of states, working through research and advocacy.
Exam tips
Common mistakes
- Calling the UN a world government, or saying it has its own army.
- Listing five organs and forgetting the Trusteeship Council (inactive since 1994).
- Saying an abstention by a permanent member is a veto: it is not.
- Treating General Assembly resolutions as binding orders.
- Calling Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch UN agencies: they are NGOs.
- Giving only one side in reform and veto questions.
How marks are usually awarded
- 1 mark: one correct option or term.
- 2 marks: two points, or one argument on each side.
- 3 marks: three points on clear bases (membership, voting, powers).
- 5 marks: five points, with both sides and a reasoned conclusion where asked.
- Source-based: quote or point to the line, then explain.