Skip to content
Skip to page content
soylai.com

International Organisations — Notes

6 sections 7 min readBeta

1. Why international organisations?

An international organisation is a body set up by states, through agreement, to help them cooperate. It is not a world government: it acts through the consent of its members and has no army of its own.

Why needed:

  • Many problems (epidemics, conflict, trade, climate) cross borders.
  • A permanent body gives rules, information and a meeting place, which lowers distrust and the cost of each negotiation.
  • It offers smaller states a voice.

They cannot abolish war, but they make cooperation and peaceful settlement more likely.

Table of four shared problems (epidemics, war, trade and money, climate) with why one state cannot solve each alone and how an international organisation helps
Shared problemWhy one state cannot solve it aloneHow an organisation helps
EpidemicsDiseases cross borders quicklyEarly warning and common health standards
War and conflictEach side distrusts the otherA forum for talks and peacekeeping
Trade and moneyRules must be the same for allAgreed rules and a place to settle disputes
Climate and environmentPollution has no passportJoint targets and shared information

Key terms

International organisation

A body created by agreement among states to help them cooperate on shared problems.

Sovereign state

A state with supreme authority over its own territory, which joins organisations by its own choice.

2. Evolution of the UN

  • The League of Nations (1920) was formed after the First World War but failed to prevent the Second.
  • During that war the allies planned a new body; the Atlantic Charter (1941) set out common aims.
  • The UN Charter was signed at the San Francisco conference in June 1945.
  • The UN came into existence on 24 October 1945 (UN Day) with 51 members; today it has 193.
  • India was one of the founding members.

Aims: maintain international peace and security; develop friendly relations among nations; cooperate on economic, social and humanitarian problems; promote human rights.

From the League to the UN
Anchor each event to a war or era before you memorise the year.
EventYearClue for ordering
League of Nations begins work1920After the First World War
Atlantic Charter1941During the Second World War
UN Charter signed; UN begins1945End of the Second World War
IAEA set up1957Atoms for peace, Cold War years
WTO replaces GATT1995After the Cold War

Key terms

League of Nations

The organisation set up after the First World War; it failed to stop the Second World War.

UN Charter

The founding treaty of the UN, signed at San Francisco in June 1945.

3. Principal organs and specialised agencies

  1. General Assembly: all members; one state, one vote; debates, budget, elections; resolutions mostly recommendations.
  2. Security Council: 15 members: 5 permanent (USA, UK, France, Russia, China) with a veto, 10 non-permanent elected by the Assembly for two-year terms (five each year). A substantive decision needs 9 votes and no negative vote by a permanent member; an abstention is not a veto.
  3. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): economic and social cooperation; coordinates specialised agencies.
  4. International Court of Justice: at The Hague; legal disputes between states; advisory opinions.
  5. Secretariat: administration; headed by the Secretary-General, appointed by the Assembly on the Council's recommendation.
  6. Trusteeship Council: supervised trust territories; suspended operations in 1994.

Specialised agencies (WHO, ILO, FAO, UNESCO and others) are separate organisations linked to the UN and coordinated through ECOSOC.

The six principal organs set up by the Charter.
The Security Council at a glance.
Agencies are separate bodies linked to the UN and coordinated through ECOSOC.
Specialised agencyField
World Health Organization (WHO)Health standards, epidemics, vaccination
International Labour Organization (ILO)Workers' rights and labour standards
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)Food security and farming
UNESCOEducation, science and culture

Key terms

Veto

The power of each permanent member to block a substantive Security Council decision by voting against it.

Specialised agency

An autonomous organisation working in one field, linked to the UN by agreement.

4. Reform of the UN after the Cold War

Why: membership has grown from 51 to 193; the Cold War is over; new powers and new threats (terrorism, civil wars, climate, disease) have emerged; but the permanent five remain those of 1945.

Two kinds of reform:

  • Structures and processes: membership of the Security Council, the veto, working methods.
  • Jurisdiction: which issues the UN should take up.

Proposed criteria for new permanent members (debated, none adopted): major economic power; major military power; substantial budget contribution; large population; respect for democracy and human rights; adding regional and cultural diversity.

The veto: supporters say it keeps great powers committed and makes action enforceable; critics call it undemocratic and outdated. Changing the Charter needs the agreement of the permanent members.

A dominant power: after the Cold War, concern grew that one powerful member could shape the UN through its budget share and veto; yet the UN remains the main forum for all states.

Table of the two kinds of UN reform: structures and processes, for example Security Council membership and the veto; and jurisdiction, for example terrorism, development and human rights
Kind of reformMeaningExample
Structures and processesHow the UN is organised and decidesChanging Security Council membership or the veto
JurisdictionWhich issues the UN should deal withTerrorism, development, human rights
Proposals made in the reform debate; no criterion has been formally adopted.
Proposed criterionWhat it tries to measure
Major economic powerCapacity to contribute and influence
Major military powerCapacity to keep peace
Substantial contributor to the UN budgetCommitment to the organisation
Large populationWeight of people represented
Respects democracy and human rightsValues of the Charter
Adds regional and cultural diversityRepresentation of the whole world
Table of arguments to keep the veto (keeps major powers in, easier enforcement, avoids the League's fate) and to limit it (one state blocks the majority, Council silent in crises, reflects 1945)
Keep the vetoLimit or end the veto
Keeps major powers inside the UNLets one state block the will of the majority
Decisions backed by the strong are easier to enforceLeaves the Council silent in some crises
Avoids the fate of the LeagueReflects 1945 power, not today's world

Key terms

Jurisdiction

The range of issues on which an organisation may act.

Permanent member

One of five states with a permanent Security Council seat and a veto.

5. India and UN reform

India supports a stronger, more representative UN with an expanded Security Council in both categories, and seeks a permanent seat. It works with Brazil, Germany and Japan (the G4), which also seek seats.

Grounds put forward: one of the two most populous countries and the largest democracy; long participation in UN peacekeeping; a large and growing economy and regular contributions; a voice for developing countries; it has served as an elected member several times (most recently 2021–22).

Objections raised by some states: possession of nuclear weapons; disputes with neighbours; doubts about regional representation; and a group of states that opposes any new permanent seats and prefers more elected seats.

These are positions held by different states; examiners expect both sides.

Stated as the views of different states, not as verdicts.
Arguments made for IndiaObjections raised by some states
One of the two most populous countries and the largest democracyPossession of nuclear weapons
Long record in UN peacekeepingDisputes with some neighbours
Large, growing economy; regular UN contributionsDoubt whether one state can speak for a whole region
Voice for developing countriesSome states oppose any new permanent seats
Imagined state. Weigh the criteria; do not just count ticks.
CriterionImagined state VarunadeshMeets it?
Economic powerTenth-largest economy (imagined)Yes
Budget contributionAmong the top fifteen payers (imagined)Yes
PopulationAbout 9 crore people (imagined)Partly
Democracy and rightsRegular elections, free press (imagined)Yes
Regional balanceIts region already has a permanent memberNo

Key terms

G4

Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, which support each other's bids for permanent seats.

6. Other international organisations

  • IMF: planned at Bretton Woods (1944); oversees the international financial system, advises on policy and lends in payments crises; votes weighted by quota.
  • World Bank: also from Bretton Woods; loans and grants for development (infrastructure, education, health, agriculture, environment, governance); criticised for conditions.
  • WTO: set up in 1995 as the successor to GATT (1948); rules of world trade and dispute settlement; developing countries say major economies dominate.
  • IAEA: set up in 1957; promotes peaceful nuclear energy and runs safeguard inspections.
  • Amnesty International: an NGO that researches abuses, publishes reports and campaigns for human rights.
  • Human Rights Watch: an NGO based in New York; investigation, media and lobbying, for example against child soldiers and landmines.

NGOs have no enforcement power; their influence comes from publicity.

Table of the IMF and World Bank (planned at Bretton Woods in 1944), the WTO (1995, after GATT) and the IAEA (1957) with their main roles
OrganisationSet upMain role
International Monetary Fund1945 (planned at Bretton Woods, 1944)Global financial system; help in payments crises
World Bank1945 (planned at Bretton Woods, 1944)Loans and grants for development
World Trade Organization1995 (after GATT, 1948)Rules of world trade; trade disputes
International Atomic Energy Agency1957Peaceful nuclear energy; safeguard inspections
Comparison table of the IMF and World Bank: focus, typical help, weighted voting, and common criticisms
IMFWorld Bank
FocusStability of the financial systemLong-term development
Typical helpShort-term loans in payments crises; policy adviceLoans and grants for roads, schools, health, farming
VotingWeighted by contribution (quota)Weighted by contribution
Common criticismStrict conditions on borrowersProjects and conditions shaped by rich members
Comparison table of the WTO (trade rules, dispute settlement, debate about big economies) and the IAEA (peaceful nuclear energy, inspections, need for consent)
WTOIAEA
PurposeRules for international tradePeaceful use of nuclear energy
How it worksNegotiated agreements; dispute settlementTechnical help; inspections and safeguards
DebateDeveloping states say big economies set the agendaInspections need the consent of states
Comparison table of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch: both NGOs, their methods, examples of their concerns, and their lack of enforcement power
Amnesty InternationalHuman Rights Watch
TypeNon-governmental organisationNon-governmental organisation
MethodsResearch, reports, letters and campaignsInvestigation, reports, media and lobbying
Examples of concernPrisoners of conscience, torture, death penaltyChild soldiers, landmines, abuses in conflicts
PowerNo power to enforce; influence through publicityNo power to enforce; influence through publicity

Key terms

Bretton Woods institutions

The IMF and the World Bank, planned at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference.

NGO

A non-governmental organisation, independent of states, working through research and advocacy.

Exam tips

Common mistakes

  • Calling the UN a world government, or saying it has its own army.
  • Listing five organs and forgetting the Trusteeship Council (inactive since 1994).
  • Saying an abstention by a permanent member is a veto: it is not.
  • Treating General Assembly resolutions as binding orders.
  • Calling Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch UN agencies: they are NGOs.
  • Giving only one side in reform and veto questions.

How marks are usually awarded

  • 1 mark: one correct option or term.
  • 2 marks: two points, or one argument on each side.
  • 3 marks: three points on clear bases (membership, voting, powers).
  • 5 marks: five points, with both sides and a reasoned conclusion where asked.
  • Source-based: quote or point to the line, then explain.