Skip to content
Skip to page content
soylai.com

The Crisis of Democratic Order — notes

6 sections 6 min readBeta

1. Economic and political setting after 1971

The Congress won the 1971 Lok Sabha election with a large majority on the slogan Garibi Hatao, and the December 1971 war ended in the birth of Bangladesh.

Then came strain:

  • the cost of the war and of caring for refugees;
  • a halt in some foreign aid;
  • the steep rise in world oil prices in 1973;
  • poor monsoons and a fall in food output;
  • slow industrial growth and rising unemployment.

The result was high inflation, scarcity and discontent, especially among students and the urban middle class.

Table of economic strains after 1971 and their effects: war and refugee costs meant heavy spending; a halt in some aid reduced development funds; the 1973 oil price rise made fuel dearer; weak monsoons made food scarce; slow industry meant fewer jobs
StrainEffect on people
Cost of the 1971 war and refugeesHeavy public spending
Halt in some foreign aidLess money for development
World oil prices jump (1973)Fuel and transport dearer
Weak monsoonsFood scarce and costly
Slow industryFewer jobs, more unemployment
The road to June 1975

Key terms

Inflation

A general and sustained rise in prices.

2. Movements of 1974

Gujarat (January 1974): students began protesting over food prices, scarcity and corruption; opposition parties joined; the state came under President's Rule, and assembly elections were held in June 1975.

Bihar (March 1974): students again took the lead; Jayaprakash Narayan (JP) agreed to guide them, demanded the dismissal of the state government, and gave a call for Total Revolution (Sampoorna Kranti), a non-violent transformation of society and politics. He later led a large march to Parliament (March 1975).

Railway strike (May 1974): unions led by George Fernandes struck nationwide over pay and service conditions; the government declared it illegal and arrested many workers; it ended after about three weeks.

Comparison table of the Gujarat and Bihar movements of 1974: both started by students over prices and corruption; Gujarat led to President's Rule and assembly elections in June 1975; Bihar was led by Jayaprakash Narayan, who demanded the state government's dismissal and called for Total Revolution
Gujarat (from January 1974)Bihar (from March 1974)
Started byStudentsStudents
IssuesPrices, food, corruptionPrices, food, unemployment, corruption
LeadershipStudents; opposition parties joinedJayaprakash Narayan
OutcomePresident's Rule; assembly polls in June 1975Demand to dismiss the state government; call for Total Revolution

Key terms

Total Revolution

JP's call for a peaceful, all-round change in social, economic and political life.

President's Rule

Central rule in a state under Article 356 when its government is dismissed or suspended.

3. The government and the judiciary

  • The government wanted wide power to amend the Constitution, including fundamental rights, to carry out its programme.
  • In Kesavananda Bharati (1973) the Supreme Court held that Parliament can amend the Constitution but not its basic structure.
  • In April 1973 a new Chief Justice was appointed by passing over three more senior judges. Critics saw a threat to judicial independence; the government spoke of judges in tune with social change, and the phrase "committed judiciary" entered the debate.
  • On 12 June 1975 the Allahabad High Court, on a petition by Raj Narain, held Indira Gandhi's 1971 election void for corrupt practice. On 24 June the Supreme Court granted a partial stay.
Government and judiciary
Thirteen days in June 1975

Key terms

Basic structure

Core features of the Constitution that cannot be removed by amendment, as held in 1973.

4. The Emergency (June 1975 – March 1977)

Proclamation: late on 25 June 1975, under Article 352, on the ground of internal disturbance; signed by President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed on the Prime Minister's advice; the Cabinet endorsed it on 26 June.

What it meant:

  • Rights: enforcement of fundamental rights through courts was suspended; preventive detention under laws such as MISA; leaders and workers arrested; some organisations banned. In 1976 the Supreme Court majority accepted that detainees could not seek habeas corpus during the suspension.
  • Press: pre-censorship; some papers left blank spaces, a few closed.
  • Federalism: the Union could direct states and legislate on state subjects.
  • Parliament: elections were postponed; the 42nd Amendment (1976) extended legislatures' term to six years and added Fundamental Duties and new Preamble words.
  • Government's programme: the Twenty-Point Programme of economic relief.
Four areas where the Emergency changed how democracy worked
Table of the proclamation: Article 352; ground internal disturbance; signed by President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed on the Prime Minister's advice; the Cabinet endorsed it the next morning; it lasted until March 1977
QuestionAnswer for 1975
Article352 (national emergency)
Ground citedInternal disturbance
Signed byPresident Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, on the Prime Minister's advice
CabinetInformed and endorsed the next morning
Lasted untilMarch 1977
Table of press responses to censorship: blank columns as a silent sign; closing down as refusal; printing only approved news as compliance
Response of the pressWhat it meant
Blank columnsSilent sign to readers that news was cut
Closing downRefusal to work under censorship
Printing approved news onlyCompliance; some praise of the government
Table of 42nd Amendment changes and their later position: six-year term restored to five by the 44th Amendment; Preamble words and Fundamental Duties remain
42nd Amendment (1976)Later position
Term of legislatures: six yearsRestored to five by the 44th Amendment
Preamble: socialist, secular, integrity addedStill part of the Preamble
Fundamental Duties insertedStill part of the Constitution

Key terms

Preventive detention

Holding a person to prevent a feared act, without charge or trial.

Censorship

Official control of what may be published.

Habeas corpus

A writ asking a court to have a detained person produced and the detention justified.

5. Controversies and the debate

Controversies: mass detentions; coercion in the family planning drive; demolitions in parts of Delhi; and influence on officials by persons without official posts. The Shah Commission (1977), under retired judge J. C. Shah, inquired into these.

Government's case: agitations and appeals to officials to disobey threatened order; an elected government should not be removed by street protest; pro-poor measures needed speed.

Critics' case: protest and movements are democratic rights; the ordinary law could deal with disorder; the timing after the court verdict raised questions about motive; the excesses showed the danger of unchecked power.

Two sides of the debate, stated neutrally
Commission appointed in 1977, headed by a retired Supreme Court judge.
AreaWhat the Shah Commission examined
DetentionsThousands held without trial
Family planningTargets and complaints of coercion
DemolitionsHomes and shops in Delhi pulled down
AdministrationInfluence of persons without official posts

6. 1977 and after: lessons

Elections: announced in January 1977; leaders released; opposition parties formed the Janata Party; Jagjivan Ram formed the Congress for Democracy. In March 1977 the Congress lost power at the Centre for the first time (routed in the north, steady in the south); Morarji Desai became Prime Minister.

Janata years: the Shah Commission; liberties restored; but no common programme and rivalry among leaders led to splits. Charan Singh was Prime Minister briefly in 1979; the Congress returned in January 1980.

44th Amendment (1978): armed rebellion replaced internal disturbance; written advice of the Union Cabinet required; approval by both Houses by special majority within one month; Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended.

Lessons: democracy proved resilient; constitutional safeguards were strengthened; awareness of civil liberties grew and new civil liberties groups emerged; but institutions need vigilance.

Comparison table of emergency provisions before and after the 44th Amendment: internal disturbance replaced by armed rebellion; written Cabinet advice required; Articles 20 and 21 protected; approval by both Houses by special majority within one month
Before 1978After the 44th Amendment
Ground: internal disturbanceGround: armed rebellion
Proclaimed on the Prime Minister's adviceOnly on the Cabinet's written advice
Life and liberty could be suspendedArticles 20 and 21 never suspended
Simple approval rulesBoth Houses, special majority, within one month
From the Emergency to 1980
The Janata years
Lessons of the Emergency

Key terms

Janata Party

The party formed in 1977 by the coming together of major non-Congress parties.

Civil liberties

Freedoms of the individual protected against the state, such as speech and personal liberty.

Exam tips

Common mistakes

  • Writing external aggression as the ground in 1975: it was internal disturbance.
  • Saying the Supreme Court set aside the election: it was the Allahabad High Court; the Supreme Court gave a partial stay.
  • Mixing up the 42nd (1976, during the Emergency) and 44th (1978, Janata government) Amendments.
  • Calling the Shah Commission a court: it was a commission of inquiry.
  • Writing one-sided answers to "examine" or "evaluate": give both sides and a conclusion.

How marks are usually awarded

  • 1 mark: one correct option, term or date.
  • 2–3 marks: one explained point per mark.
  • 5 marks: five numbered points with dates and examples.
  • Source questions: quote the line, name the concept, explain.